The spreadsheet burden
Manually tracking years of project work across UK-SPEC competencies creates delays, inconsistency, and missing evidence.
Built for engineering employers in the UK
From Graduate Engineer to Chartered Status. With a clearer, faster pathway.
The digital workspace for UK engineers and technicians to map competencies, track evidence, and close the gap to Professional Registration.
We help your mid-level engineers become CEng-ready faster, so you can confidently meet Professional Competence requirements on your next public-sector tender.
Limited pilot cohort for 2026
For UK infrastructure and M&E consultancies
Pilot-first • Typical onboarding: 1–2 weeks • UK-SPEC aligned workflow
Pilot readiness snapshot
What improves in the first 90 days
Teams on a 90-day pilot typically see mentor review cadence move from ad-hoc to fortnightly, candidates arrive at submission windows with complete A–E evidence for the first time, and engineering directors can pull a readiness report in under five minutes.
- ✓Competency-mapped evidence logging (A–E)
- ✓CPD hours logging with date and activity tracking
- ✓Structured manager and mentor review workflows
- ✓Export-ready evidence packs for applications
Typical pilot pattern based on customer rollout feedback: fewer last-minute submission gaps and clearer progression reporting for leadership.
Teams and leaders this workflow is built for
Engineering Directors
Heads of Discipline
Mentor Leads
Professional Development Teams
A-E
Built around full UK-SPEC competency mapping.
90-day
Pilot model to prove adoption and readiness uplift quickly.
Export-ready
Evidence packs prepared for stronger CEng/IEng submissions.
The problem
Most engineers have the technical skill, but Professional Review outcomes still suffer from weak evidence mapping.
The mentor bottleneck
Senior engineers are busy, so candidates often miss timely feedback on weaker areas like management, commercial, and leadership evidence.
The registration gap
Strong engineers can remain below Chartered status for years, impacting progression and tender confidence.
The solution
Built for the UK-SPEC framework and real employer workflows
A clean, practical workflow for candidates, mentors, and engineering leadership.
Smart UK-SPEC competency mapping
Tag project tasks directly to A–E standards as they happen, so evidence quality stays consistent.
Manager & mentor reviews
Comments, approvals, and audit trail in one clear workflow.
CPD hours logging & dashboards
Log CPD hours by activity and date, then view progress, competency gaps, and next actions at a glance.
Leadership reporting
Track readiness by team, office, or business unit.
Export-ready evidence packs
Generate polished outputs for applications and interview prep.
Gap analysis dashboard
Instantly see which competency areas are under-evidenced before application windows.
Choose your path
Pathway-focused workflows for EngTech, IEng, and CEng
Aligned to UK-SPEC pathways so each candidate can build stronger evidence with role-relevant guidance.
EngTech pathway
For technicians, apprentices, and site-based specialists focused on practical delivery and safe operations.
- • Quick-log evidence for on-site problem solving and safety contribution
- • Structured records for technical application and team support
- • Prompted entries to capture supervisory and risk-management examples
IEng pathway
For project managers, senior technicians, and engineers moving from delivery into systems and team management.
- • Project lifecycle evidence from brief to handover
- • Better documentation of budget, delivery, and people coordination
- • Process improvement logs including sustainability-related contributions
CEng pathway
For design leaders, consultants, and senior engineers demonstrating innovation, complexity, and accountability.
- • Evidence mapping for complex, multi-disciplinary decisions
- • Clear capture of technical leadership and uncertainty management
- • Professional Review preparation toolkit powered by tagged evidence
Manager view
Common ground for mentors, delegated engineers, and leadership
Competency heatmaps to spot where cohorts need stronger commercial, legal, or leadership exposure.
Review-ready exports that save senior engineer time during internal assessment cycles.
Cohort-level visibility so support can be prioritised before critical application windows.
2026 pilot program
Help shape the future of engineering development
We’re inviting a small number of UK engineering firms to join an exclusive pilot cohort.
What you get
- • Free access for up to 10 candidates for 3 months
- • Onboarding session for mentors and delegated engineers
- • Priority input on the 2026 feature roadmap
What we ask
- • Bi-weekly feedback on usability and feature value
- • A short written testimonial after successful outcomes
- • Permission to discuss results in a case study
Simple pricing
Pilot
For teams validating process and adoption.
£299 / month
- • Up to 25 candidates
- • Manager review workflows
- • UK-SPEC competency tracking
- • Export-ready PDFs
Team
For growing teams that need clearer cross-team oversight.
£599 / month
- • Up to 75 candidates
- • Multi-manager review workflows
- • Team-level readiness reporting
- • Export-ready evidence packs
Organisation
For scaling across multiple teams and business units.
Custom
- • Unlimited teams
- • Advanced readiness reporting
- • Priority onboarding support
- • SSO roadmap support
What teams say
“We finally have a consistent process for CEng evidence across our offices.”
“Mentor reviews are faster and candidates always know their next step.”
“The export packs cut prep time massively before submission windows.”
Compatibility: Designed to support ICE, IET, IMechE, and CABE pathways.
Security: GDPR-conscious workflow and secure cloud hosting practices.
Built by practitioners: Created with real input from engineering and construction teams.
Free resource
UK-SPEC Readiness Checklist (for engineering teams)
Use this practical checklist to assess competency evidence quality, manager review cadence, and Professional Registration readiness before your next CEng/IEng submission cycle.
Frequently asked questions
Quick answers to common rollout, integration, and pilot questions.
Is this officially integrated with ICE or IET submission portals?
The platform is UK-SPEC aligned and export-ready for application workflows. Direct integrations can be scoped separately.
We already use Engineering Council mycareerpath. What’s different?
mycareerpath is built for individual engineers preparing submissions to their institution. CPDPath is built for engineering employers, so directors, discipline leads, and mentors can see across whole teams, manage review workload, spot submission readiness risks early, and report progress to leadership. They solve different problems and can be used alongside each other.
Can candidates and managers both use the system?
Yes. Candidates log evidence and CPD, while managers and mentors review progression and provide structured feedback.
Can we pilot first before a full rollout?
Absolutely. Most customers start with one business unit and expand after proving improved readiness.
How long does onboarding usually take?
Most pilot teams can be onboarded in 1-2 weeks, depending on number of users and readiness of your current CPD/evidence process.
What does a typical pilot include?
A pilot usually covers one business unit, configured competencies, manager workflows, and reporting so you can validate adoption and outcome improvements quickly.
Do you support data export and portability?
Yes. You can export evidence packs and relevant progression data to support submission prep, internal reporting, and continuity needs.
Can we track CPD hours and evidence in one place?
Yes. CPDPath supports structured CPD hours logging alongside competency-linked evidence, so teams can monitor both activity and readiness in one workflow.
Designed for institutions like IET, IMechE, and ICE?
CPDPath is designed for teams progressing through UK-SPEC-style workflows used across institutions such as IET, IMechE, and ICE. CPDPath is an independent platform and is not officially affiliated with these institutions.
Can this work alongside our existing tools?
Yes. Many teams run CPDPath alongside existing HR/L&D and project systems during pilot, then formalise integration priorities after proving value.
What support do we get during rollout?
You get onboarding guidance, workflow setup support, and practical rollout advice focused on manager adoption and candidate consistency.
Ready to improve your professional registration pipeline?
Book a short demo and see how your team can move from ad-hoc notes to a clear UK-SPEC evidence journey.